Keberhasilan La Via Campesina sebagai Gerakan Petani Transnasional dalam Memajukan Agenda Kedaulatan Pangan di Ekuador
La Via Campesina's Success as a Transnational Peasant Movement in Advancing the Food Sovereignty Agenda in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33019/jpi.v6i1.198Kata Kunci:
Gerakan Petani Transnasional, La Via Campesina, Kedaulatan Pangan, Konstitusi Ekuador 2008Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami perjuangan organisasi-organisasi petani anggota La Via Campesina di Ekudor sehingga berhasil mengintegrasikan agenda kedaulatan pangan ke dalam Konstitusi Ekuador 2008. Kerangka teoritis yang digunakan adalah gerakan sosial dengan berfokus pada elemen struktur mobilisasi untuk memahami kemunculan dan perkembangan sebuah gerakan sosial dalam memperjuangkan agenda-agenda politiknya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian studi kasus. Sementara teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi dokumentasi dengan teknik analisis data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa keberhasilan tersebut ditopang oleh sejumlah faktor, yakni (a) peran LVC dalam mendesiminasi gagasan kedaulatan pangan di tingkat global, yang pada gilirannya menjadi point of reference bagi perjuangan organisasi anggota di tingkat nasional, (b) kapasitas organisasi dalam memobilisasi sumberdaya jaringan, dan (c) mobilisasi dan partisipasi langsung dalam proses legal drafting konstitusi dengan memanfaatkan terbukanya kesempatan politik di bawah pemerintahan Rafael Correa.
Unduhan
Referensi
Arce, A., Sherwood, S., & Paredes, M. (2015). Repositioning food sovereignty: Between Ecuadorian nationalist and cosmopolitan politics. In Food Sovereignty in International Context (pp. 135–152). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764429-17
Baylis, J., Owens, P., & Smith, S. (2017). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/BAYTGO-7
BBC. (2007). Ecuador swears in new president. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6262555.stm
Borras Jr, S. M., Franco, J. C., & Suárez, S. M. (2015). Land and food sovereignty. Third World Quarterly, 36(3), 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029225
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Caren, N. (2007). Political process theory. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518
Claeys, P. (2013). From Food Sovereignty to Peasants’ Rights: An overview of La Via Campesina’s Rights-based claims over the last 20 years. Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue. https://dial.uclouvain.be/downloader/downloader.php?pid=boreal:137348&datastream=PDF_01
Claeys, P. (2015). Human rights and the food sovereignty movement: Reclaiming control. Routledge. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB17930857
Claeys, P., & Edelman, M. (2020). The United Nations Declaration on the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1672665
Clark, P. (2016). Can the State Foster Food Sovereignty? Insights from the Case of Ecuador. Journal of Agrarian Change, 16(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12094
Constituion of The Republic of Ecuador. (2008). Constituion of The Republic of Ecuador.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40
Desmarais, A. A., Rivera-Ferre, M. G., & Gasco, B. (2014). Building alliances for food sovereignty: La Vía Campesina, NGOs, and social movements. In Alternative agrifood movements: Patterns of convergence and divergence. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1057-192220140000021009
Dunford, R. (2016). The Politics of Transnational Peasant Struggle: Resistance, Rights and Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield. https://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/15729/
Edelman, M. (2017). Critical Perspectives on Food Sovereignty: Global Agrarian Transformations, Volume 2. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315689562
Edelman, M., & Borras, S. M. (2016). Political Dynamics of Transnational Agrarian Movements. Practical Action Publishing, Fernwood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449142
Elake, G. L., Susilowati, R., & Ferdiansyah, R. (2022). Aktivisme Petani Transnasional: Perjuangan La Via Campesina dan Serikat Petani Indonesia untuk Kedaulatan Pangan. Media Bina Ilmiah, 17(5), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.33578/mbi.v17i5.219
Ellinger, A. D., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2005). Case study research methods. Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Endicott, S. (2020, December 17). 17 South American Groups Striving for Food and Land Rights. Food Tank. https://foodtank.com/news/2020/12/movements-in-south-america-fighting-for-food-and-land-sovereignty/
European Cordination Via Campesina. (2018). Food Sovereignty NOW! A Guide to Food Sovereignty. European Cordination Via Campesina.
FENACLE. (n.d.). FENACLE – FENACLE. Retrieved August 20, 2021, from http://www.fenacle-ecuador.org/fenacle/
FENOCIN. (2021). Causa Nuestra | FENOCIN. https://www.fenocin.org/informacion-institucional/quienes-somos/
Flores, A. M., Ruivenkamp, G., & Jongerden, J. (2018). Drafting a law, dissolving a proposal: Food sovereignty and the state in Ecuador. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 7(3), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277976018800590
Foweraker, J. (1995). Theorizing Social Movements. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3050(96)89762-2
Goodwin, G. (2017). The quest to bring land under social and political control: Land reform struggles of the past and present in Ecuador. Journal of Agrarian Change, 17(3), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12181
Henderson, T. P. (2017). State–peasant movement relations and the politics of food sovereignty in Mexico and Ecuador. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1236024
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1996). The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914-1991. Vintage Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/20047214
Intriago, R., Gortaire Amézcua, R., Bravo, E., & O’Connell, C. (2017). Agroecology in Ecuador: Historical processes, achievements, and challenges. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 41(3–4), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1284174
Jameson, K. P. (2011). The Indigenous Movement in Ecuador: The Struggle for a Plurinational State. Latin American Perspectives, 38(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x10384210
Kautsky, K. (1988). The Agrarian Question. Zwan Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066159008438422
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00179
La Via Campesina. (2007, September 20). II International Conference Of The Via Campesina Tlaxcala, Mexico, April 18-21: Via Campesina. Via Campesina English. https://viacampesina.org/en/ii-international-conference-of-the-via-campesina-tlaxcala-mexico-april-18-21/
La Via Campesina. (2022). About La Via Campesina: Via Campesina. La Via Campesina - EN. https://viacampesina.org/en/international-peasants-voice/
Martínez Dalmau, R. (2016). Democratic constitutionalism and constitutional innovation in Ecuador: The 2008 Constitution. Latin American Perspectives, 43(1), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15571277
Mazzolini, S. (2021). Rafael Correa and the Citizen’s Revolution in Ecuador. Populism in Global Perspective: A Performative and Discursive Approach.
Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Peña, K. (2016). Social movements, the state, and the making of food sovereignty in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 43(1), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x15571278
Romero, S. (2007, February 14). Ecuador: Congress Approves Referendum on Constitutional Assembly. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/14/world/americas/14briefs-ecuadorassembly.html
Rosset, P. (2013). Re-thinking agrarian reform, land and territory in La Via Campesina. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(4), 721–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.826654
Rosset, P. (2018). Evolution of the struggle for land and territory in La Via Campesina International. In Reframing Latin American Development (pp. 164–182). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315170084-9/evolution-struggle-land-territory-la-via-campesina-international-peter-rosset
Sina, A. (2018). The Constitutional Protection of the Right to Food in Bolivia and Ecuador. In A. Isoni, M. Troisi, & M. Pierri (Eds.), Food Diversity Between Rights, Duties and Autonomies: Legal Perspectives for a Scientific, Cultural and Social Debate on the Right to Food and Agroecology (pp. 265–275). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75196-2_16
Smith, J., & Fetner, T. (2009). Structural Approaches in the Sociology of Social Movements. In B. Klandermans & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70960-4_2
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.2307/329758
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (3 edition). Cambridge University Press.
Via Campesina. (2020). Via Campesina. Via Campesina English. https://viacampesina.org/en/who-are-we/regions/south-america/
Walsh-Dilley, M., Wolford, W., & McCarthy, J. (2016). Rights for resilience: Food sovereignty, power, and resilience in development practice. Ecology and Society, 21(1) https://doi.org/10.5751/es-07981-210111
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
- Penulis memiliki hak cipta dan memberikan hak publikasi pertama kepada jurnal dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA).
- Penulis dapat membuat perjanjian kontrak tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif dari versi jurnal yang diterbitkan (misalnya, mengirimnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam bentuk buku), dengan pengakuan atas publikasi awal di jurnal ini.
- Setiap publikasi (cetak/elektronik) bersifat terbuka untuk tujuan pendidikan, penelitian, dan perpustakaan. Selain tujuan yang disebutkan di atas, dewan redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab atas pelanggaran hak cipta.
